POLITICS. TEACHING. OTHER QUESTIONABLE INTERESTS.
← Comparative Politics simulations

Comparative Politics / Electoral systems

After
the Count

Votes in. Power out.
Which rule would you defend?

Follow the same question through four real elections. Read the record, operate a rule and explain a consequence you value and a cost you accept.

Created by Yoav Duman · Free browser play · No student account

After the Count. Created by Yoav Duman. Streams of colored ballots pass through civic gateways toward parliamentary seats.
Original AI-generated conceptual cover. Historical photographs, source records and numerical evidence appear separately inside the investigation.
4 real electionsEvidence → rule → comparisonYour design, defendedSave & resume

01 / UK 2024

Where the votes land.

14.3% of votes, five seats. Why did fewer national votes produce more local victories for another party?

02 / Israel 2022

The line that matters.

150,793 valid votes and no seats. Separate ballot validity, qualification and seat allocation.

03 / Liberia 2023

A second decision.

The October leader lost in November. Compare a plurality standard with a fresh majority runoff.

04 / New Zealand 2020

Put the rules together.

Apply the MMP rule: local wins and a national threshold open different routes to representation.

Choose your way in

Make the rules do some work.

Just exploring makes written explanations optional. For class requires the briefs and final comparison. Both keep the same evidence checks, lab operations and political choices. Switch inside the game without losing your notes; class mode reopens any briefs missing written work.

Allow about 75 minutes, or divide into two sessions.

This is a provisional teaching plan. Actual learner timing and learning effects need a human pilot. A calculator, definitions and worked support help you engage with the same intellectual task.

Explain a mechanism, use a figure with the correct unit and denominator, name what the model holds fixed and defend a trade-off. The automatic checks cover bounded rule and numerical questions. Written reasoning needs human assessment.

The election archive is open

Follow the evidence.

Work saves in this browser on this website. In Notebook, download JSON and use Restore JSON to move work between devices or websites. Download TXT or print for a readable submission, then upload it through your course system. Exporting does not submit it.

After the Count

Opening activity…

Your field kit

Teach it. Keep it. Revisit it.

Source register · Artwork and photograph credits · Review and human-pilot guide · Complete release · Artwork pack

A comparison has limits.

Historical outcomes remain fixed. The UK benchmark does not allocate whole seats, Israel’s lab models qualification, Liberia’s runoff uses a new ballot and New Zealand’s lab does not recompute every alternative seat total. A numerical result is a starting point for an argument.

Also available on Possible States ↗