POLITICS. TEACHING. OTHER QUESTIONABLE INTERESTS.
← Comparative Politics simulations

Comparative Politics / Theory meets the record

When the
Center Breaks

A ruler leaves.
What actually changes?

Open the case files. Test a theory. Follow the organizations that keep authority working, or stop sustaining it. New evidence may put your first explanation in trouble.

Created by Yoav Duman · Free browser play · No student account

When the Center Breaks. Created by Yoav Duman. An empty chair and fractured public buildings above people connected through civic spaces.
Original AI-generated conceptual artwork. An invitation to investigate authority, not a historical scene or causal model.
4 real cases14 investigation filesTheory → evidence → revisionSave & resume

01 / Build the toolkit

Give the theory a job.

Distinguish four political outcomes. Turn an explanatory lens into a process involving particular actors, actions and institutions.

02 / Open the cases

Let the record push back.

Investigate Tunisia, compare Egypt and challenge a generalization with Belarus. Examine real numbers, disputed accounts, original sources and dated institutional changes.

03 / Transfer & defend

Make the explanation travel.

Write an independent Sri Lanka brief. Compare rivals, preserve your first account and propose a hypothesis with evidence that could weaken it.

The learning work

Show your reasoning.

The notebook preserves explanations and revisions for instructor review. Opening a file and meeting a word floor record an attempt; the quality of an argument needs human assessment.

Skills, practice and evidence students produce
SkillWhat students practiceWhat an instructor can examine
Concepts & theoryDistinguish leader exit, regime transformation, democratization and social revolution.Dated outcome ledger and actor-action explanation.
Evidence & numbersRead source limits, dates, units and denominators. Separate an observation from an inference.Rumor audit, source corrections and parliamentary-ballot interpretation.
Causal comparisonDevelop a serious rival and request evidence that could distinguish explanations.Egypt comparison and Belarus missing-evidence request.
Revision & transferExplain why a claim changes or survives, then test its reach in a different setting.Preserved first brief, Sri Lanka audit and testable hypothesis.
Plan three 50-minute meetings, with saving and discussion.

This is an advanced, resumable activity. Introduce state, regime, government and institutions first. An accelerated two-meeting route requires preparation and follow-up. Timing is a teaching plan to pilot.

Your commission is open

Follow the evidence.

Work saves in this browser on this website. Use Save / restore to move a progress backup between devices or websites. Use Notebook to export a report, then submit it through Canvas or your course system. Exporting does not submit it.

When the Center Breaks

Opening activity…

Your field kit

Take the files with you.

Case evidence · JSON ↓ · Cover artwork · WebP ↓

History stays difficult.

The Commission is fictional; documented historical outcomes remain fixed. Four purposively selected cases support comparison, not a general revolution success rate. Different interpretations can earn full credit when supported. Reviews used AI-simulated perspectives; classroom learning effects still require human piloting.

Also available on Possible States ↗