POLITICS. TEACHING. OTHER QUESTIONABLE INTERESTS.
← Political simulations

Welfare & inequality / Interactive investigation

Who Catches You?

The same shock. Four lives. Who gets caught by the safety net?

A missed pay packet. A clinic bill. Care that cannot wait. Step into four lives, follow how wealth accumulates, then discover why a majority wanting protection may still struggle to secure it. Test rival explanations and inspect real evidence from Sweden, the United States and Brazil.

Free to play · 50–70 min including reflection · No student account

Who Catches You? · Created by Yoav Duman
Created by Yoav Duman / יואב דומן
Welfare states, inequality & the politics of redistributionEnter the activity ↓
01

Test how protection rules catch different households and how ownership changes wealth.

02

Compare the decisive-voter argument with organized power and funded agreements.

03

Inspect three dated country cases, reconsider your explanation and apply it to Port Azure.

Your turn

Make a choice. Follow it through.

Explore independently, or choose For Class and complete the full activity. Save a progress backup before moving between devices or websites.

Who Catches You?
Open separately

Opening activity…

For instructors

Give the argument somewhere to go.

No advance reading. Concepts, model rules and dated country evidence are supplied.

Assess an explicit mechanism, accurate measures, relevant comparisons, a fair rival, evidence-based revision and the limits of inference. Completion checks presence and length, not argument quality or preferred policy.

For Class requires Full and the final report action before assignment printing or downloads. Class responses are typed in the activity. A completion check is a record of work; written reasoning needs a human reader.

Teach it. Take it with you.

The HTML game works offline. Guide and original-source links use the internet. Progress backups restore work; reports are for reading and submission.

Keep the claim within the evidence.

Households, wealth trajectories, voting and coalition rules are simplified fictional teaching models. Country evidence is frozen at 2024 and uses separately ranked income and net-wealth distributions. The comparison does not identify the causal effect of welfare policies.