The City Is Not the Walls

Student guide · Introductory Political Theory

Created by Yoav Duman · October 2026

The City Is Not the Walls. Created by Yoav Duman. Residents debate at a gateway to an ancient assembly.

Start here

The council of Kallia has fallen. The city still needs water, bread, care, and decisions. You will propose a charter, hear six residents challenge it, and use Aristotle to examine your reasons. No earlier reading of Aristotle is required.

Plan for about 70 minutes. This is an estimate, not a timer. Take longer when you need it, and pause between rounds. Your task is to understand an argument well enough to use it and question it. You can disagree with Aristotle.

Before you begin

Created by Yoav Duman. Political Theory. Revised inquiry edition, October 2026.

Follow the argument

Each round gives you enough information to begin. Read the situation, inspect the relevant source or diagram, and make a choice. Explain the connection between a reason and the power you assign. A resident can contribute something essential without that fact alone settling every question about authority.

RoundQuestion to carry with you
1 Who is the cityWho has a recognized share in public decisions, and on what grounds?
2 Living togetherHow can different functions cooperate without making the city one household?
3 A claim to ruleWho holds ultimate authority, and whose advantage does rule serve?
4 Whose judgmentWhat can experts, users, and citizens each contribute to judgment?
5 Above rulesWhen might discretion be justified, and how could it be held accountable?
6 What carries overWhat follows from a changed constitution, and what needs further evidence?

Words that do important work

Polis means a political community. A constitution is its arrangement of offices and ruling authority, not simply a written document. Aristotle identifies citizenship through a recognized share in deliberation or judgment; residence and useful work alone do not define it.

An office is a particular public role. The person managing the water schedule need not hold the power to change the charter. Trace who authorizes, reviews, appoints, and removes before you label an arrangement.

A premise is a claim an argument relies on. To test an argument, identify that claim and ask whether the case supports it. Rejecting a conclusion is stronger when you explain where the reasoning goes wrong.

Write and reconsider

The activity asks for 11 short explanations and five extended arguments. Each prompt shows its own minimum and suggested length. The combined minimum is 365 words; about 630 words are suggested. A word count helps you complete the task. Your instructor judges what the writing shows.

Two factual misunderstandings can open a brief contrasting example. Follow it and return to your saved explanation. After at most two attempts, a worked explanation is available. Your first answer stays in the report. Using help is part of learning.

If you change an earlier rule, the activity may ask you to review writing that depended on it. Your words stay saved. Revise them if necessary, or explicitly confirm that they still fit.

Save and submit

Bring one distinction you can now explain and one question you want the class to examine. Personal transfer is optional; you can use a hypothetical example without sharing private experience.